The boundary fun

Here is my submission to the Boundary Commission. Enjoy!!

Submission to the Boundary Commission for England by
Chris Chatterton on behalf of Gloucester Labour Party

GLOUCESTER
Gloucester retains the Westgate Ward and Hucclecote Ward is transferred to the Tewkesbury constituency. This achieves an electorate number for Gloucester of 73751, which is within the acceptable range. This would also re-unite the parich of Hucclecote, which is currently divided between the constituencies of Gloucester and Tewkesbury.

Electorate as BCE recommendation: 76,379
Re-instate Westgate Ward: 4,409
Transfer Hucclecote Ward to Tewkesbury: -7,037
Revised electorate fro Gloucester: 73,751

TEWKESBURY
Hucclecote is added to this constituency from Gloucester. We also propose that the Tewkesbury Wards of Twyning, Newtown, Town with Mitton and Prior’s Park are moved to the Forest of Dean Constituency. This would result in an electorate of 74391, within the acceptable range. This “new” constituency could be named ‘North Gloucestershire’.

Electorate as BCE recommendation: 77,206
Transfer of Hucclecote from Gloucester: 7,037
Transfer Twyning to Forest of Dean: -1419
Transfer Tewkesbury Newtown to Forest of Dean: -1664
Transfer Tewkesbury Prior’s Park to Forest of Dean: -2991
Transfer Tewkesbury Town with Mitton to Forest of Dean: -3778
Revised electorate for North Gloucestershire: 74,391

FOREST OF DEAN
We propose the addition of the following wards from the current Tewkesbury Constituency to the Forest of Dean Constituency: Twyning, Newtown, Town with Mitton and Prior’s Park and the return of Westgate Ward to Gloucester. This would result in a revised electorate of 78555, within the acceptable range. This “new” constituency could be named ‘West Gloucestershire’.
Electorate as BCE recommendation: 73112
Transfer Westgate ward to Gloucester: -4409
Transfer Twyning from Tewkesbury: 1419
Tranfer Newtown from Tewkesbury: 1664
Transfer Prior’s Park from Tewkesbury: 2991
Transfer Town with Mitton from Tewkesbury: 3778
Revised electorate for West Gloucestershire: 78555

COMPLIANCE WITH BCE RULES
All constituencies meet the statutory requirements regarding number of electors.
There is no division of Wards or communities. The Westgate community remains intact and the City Centre, Docks, Cathedral and Council Offices remain in Gloucester. The urban area of Tewkesbury remians intact. The community of Hucclecote is re-united.
‘Detached Parts’ We note that this role allows for some flexibility with ‘detached parts’ to be avoided as far as possible. The movement across the West Gloucestershire Constituency is impaired to a degree by the River Severn. To achieve movement from and to Tewkesbury Town requires access through another Constituency, albeit for a very short strech of road. This geographical element of the River should not prevent consideration of this proposal. It is worth drawing your attention to the BCE recommendation for the Mersey Bank Constituency in the North West Region. This proposed constituency will straddle the River Mersey, with five Wards on the South bank and two Wards on the North bank. The only connection point between the Wards is the Widnes-Runcorn road and rail bridges which are a number of miles upriver, requiring a journey of several miles through the Halton Constituency.

CONCLUSION
We trust that this submission is seen as a realistic alternative to the proposed changes to the Gloucester constituency, which will remove the heart of the City from the Constituency. Our proposal manages to ensure that no wards are split, unlike other proposals we have seen, following your guidance that wards should be viewed as the ‘building blocks’ of constituencies. We hope that you give this proposal your full consideration.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

End of the summer

As the holidays draw to a close, I am looking ahead to next week with mixed emotions. The eldest is about to start Year 2 and cannot wait. I am so proud of her and amazed at how quickly she is picking up new things. However, the youngest starts Reception this week and I am not sure how I will feel on the big day. He is definitely ready for school and I am sure he will do well. It is just going to be strange not being with him all the time. Time has gone very quickly and I am not really ready for this latest milestone. Will be interesting to see how I feel this time next week!

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

What a joke…politics

Last night I went along to watch the latest meeting of Gloucester City Council. Full Council meetings are quite interesting affairs and it is a great opportunity to see democracy in action.

However, you are occasionally confronted with something so ridiculous that it becomes difficult holding your tongue. Last night saw a great example of this. During a debate on whether Barton Street should retain it’s designation as a Conservation Area (something I fully agree with by the way), an amendment was introduced by the Labour Group asking for a full consultation with local residents who will be the ones most affected by the designation and the restrictions that follow. This appeared to me to be eminently sensible. In fact, as a Lib Dem Cllr had just introduced the motion stating that there was a need for greater engagement and consultation, I thought it should be very straightforward to be adopted. The furore that followed was ridiculous. Lib Dems and Tories joined forces in opposing the motion. It was argued that a consultation took place a number of years ago, so another isn’t needed now. Other members argued against the need to engage with local residents. One even started talking about ‘the greater good’ (very Hot Fuzz). The amendment was defeated, and I assumed we would move on to to the next item. However, and this is where it becomes a joke, the Tories decided to introduce a further amendment, one in which it is essential to have a “two-way dialogue” with local residents. How is a two-way dialogue not a form of consultation? Why oppose something only to introduce something exactly the same minutes later?

My point is this. All parties agreed that there was a need to engage more with the local community. Why was so much time taken up defeating one amendment, only to effectively reintroduce the same thing seconds later and then argue for it? Was it merely a case of party politicking? Whatever the answer, it certainly left me thinking that some of our elected representatives were left looking rather foolish last night.

Posted in politics | 2 Comments

Back again…

Well, I started this with all the right intentions and then never got round to actually blogging. Very poor effort really! Therefore, I am determined to sort this out, start setting aside some time and putting out a regular blog. I am pretty interested in most things, so I shouldn’t really run out of things to write about. Let’s see how we do this time…

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Well, here we go…

So, after months of prevarication I have finally got round to setting up a blog. I’m not entirely sure what I will be saying on here, and doubt there will be many who will interested in my ramblings, but if you stick with me you can expect some thoughts on a wide range of topics. I imagine there will be quite a bit on politics, both local and national, as well as sport, education, literature, music and history. Stuff I’m interested in basically!

Anyway, welcome and I hope to keep your interest.

Posted in Uncategorized | 4 Comments

Hello world!

Welcome to WordPress.com. This is your first post. Edit or delete it and start blogging!

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment